Clinical Review Abstract
Trials in Progress Abstract
Abstracts selected for publication but not presentation at the Annual Meeting
Abstracts granted an exception in accordance with ASCO's Conflict of Interest Policy
A randomized phase III comparison of standard-dose (60 Gy) versus high-dose (74 Gy) conformal chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Results on radiation dose in RTOG 0617.
Local-regional Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer - Non-small Cell Local-regional/Small Cell/Other Thoracic Cancers
2013 ASCO Annual Meeting
J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 7501)
Author(s): Jeffrey D Bradley, Rebecca Paulus, Ritsuko Komaki, Gregory A. Masters, Kenneth Forster, Steven E. Schild, Jeffrey Bogart, Yolanda I. Garces, Samir Narayan, Vivek Kavadi, Lucien Alexander Nedzi, Jeff M. Michalski, Douglas Johnson, Robert Malcolm MacRae, Walter John Curran, Hak Choy, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Statistical Center, Philadelphia, PA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Christiana Care, Newark, DE; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; St Joseph Mercy Hosp, Ann Arbor, MI; Texas Oncology, Sugarland, TX; The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Florida Radiation Oncology Group, Jacksonville, FL; The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Background: The first objective of RTOG 0617 was to compare the overall survival(OS) of patients(pts) treated with standard-dose(SD)(60Gy) versus high-dose(HD)(74Gy) radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy(CT). Methods: This Phase III Intergroup trial randomized 464 pts with Stage III NSCLC to the SD(60Gy) vs. HD(74Gy) arms prior to closure of the HD arm. Concurrent CT included weekly paclitaxel(45 mg/m2) and carboplatin(AUC=2). Pts randomized to cetuximab received a 400 mg/m2 loading dose on Day 1 followed by weekly doses of 250 mg/m2. All pts were to receive consolidation CT. We are reporting the final results on radiation dose. Results: 464 pts were accrued prior to closure of the HD arm in 6/11, of which 419 were eligible for analysis. Median follow up was 17.2 months. There were 2 and 10 grade 5 treatment-related adverse events(AEs) on the SD and HD arms, respectively. Grade 3+AEs were 74.2% and 78.2% on SD and HD arms, respectively (p=0.34). The median survival times and 18-month OS rates for the SD and HD arms were 28.7 vs 19.5 months, and 66.9% vs 53.9% respectively (p=0.0007). The primary cause of death was lung cancer (72.2% vs 73.5%)(p=0.84). Local failure rates at 18 months were 25.1% vs 34.3% for SD and HD patients, respectively(p=0.03). Local-regional and distant failures at 18 months were 35.3% vs 44%(p=0.04) and 42.4% vs 47.8%(p=0.16) for SD and HD arms, respectively. Factors predictive of less favorable OS on multivariate analysis were higher radiation dose, higher esophagitis/dysphagia grade, greater gross tumor volume, and heart volume >5 Gy. Conclusions: In this setting of chemoradiation for locally-advanced Stage III NSCLC, 60 Gy is superior to 74 Gy in terms of OS and local-regional control. The effect of the anti-EGFR antibody (cetuximab) awaits further follow up. This project was supported by RTOG grant U10 CA21661, CCOP grant U10 CA37422, and ATC U24 CA 81647 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Eli Lilly and Company. Clinical trial information: NCT00533949.
Other Abstracts in this Sub-Category:
Meeting: 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting Abstract No: 7500 First Author: C. A. Butts
Meeting: 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting Abstract No: 7502 First Author: H. C. Fernando
Meeting: 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting Abstract No: 7504 First Author: J. Sorensen